From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934731Ab1KJOZn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:25:43 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:60055 "EHLO earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220Ab1KJOZl (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:25:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:25:39 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Anton Vorontsov , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c) Message-ID: <20111110142539.2d49a62e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu> References: <20111011201127.455df266dcbffb1d621f8576@canb.auug.org.au> <4E94A920.40503@xenotime.net> <4E987829.3080104@xenotime.net> <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org O> > > drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c:55:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > > > > [adding Author: Anton] > > > > Build error still present in linux-next of 20111014. > > This build failure regression report was ignored twice and then > pushed upstream and is still unfixed a month after the initial > report. Upstream now fails to build on like 25% of x86 configs. > > What's going on with this bug guys? As I've said before the driver shouldn't be trying to use "NO_IRQ", Not having an irq is 0 as in if (!dev->irq)