mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: "Gábor Lénárt" <lgb@lgb.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: capabilities question(s)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:59:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110155947.GA17085@hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110115144.GD10997@vega.lgb.hu>

Quoting Gábor Lénárt (lgb@lgb.hu):
> Hi All,
> 
> I have the problem that I can't find too much informations about
> capabilities implemented by the Linux kernel, and its usage. 
> I even don't have header file sys/capability.h suggested by man
> page of capget (on ubuntu, if it does count). However it's not the major
> problem, as I've found example to use syscall() from sys/syscall.h and
> stuffs in linux/capability.h. Well, ignore it, I've just found out
> that I need libcap-dev to install. However the problem remains:
> 
> What I want to do: I need user to be able to do chroot() once, then I want
> to drop that capability (to be safe?).  My program (a server) runs as root,
> but after initialization it changes uid/gid (in a forked process).  However
> I want to keep chroot capability even after the uid/gid change so I can do a
> chroot() even as non-root.  It it possible at all? I need this so I feel

What you want is

	prctl(PR_SET_KEEPCAPS, 1);

That will let you keep the capabilities across the uid change.  Note that
this will get reset, and your privilege dropped, after a subsequent execve().
If that doesn't work for you, then you may want to look into running that
task with different securebits settings (using prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, XYZ)).
See 'man 7 capabilities' for more information on that.

HTH,
-serge

> more secure not to run things as root, since I need to do many things before
> I can call chroot(). So I guessed, it's more secure to use non-root user
> to do these, before I can do chroot().
> 
> As far as I can see, I can set capability as root, but after uid/gid change,
> I lost that capability, and - of course - I cannot set it as a user then.
> 
> Or should I use root user anyway, just drop all of the capabilities I don't
> need just keep uid/gid change and chroot? Anyway, then I have the problem
> that I am still root for the filesystem permission checks, and it's
> something I don't want to do, because the things my server do before chroot
> is not so secure ...
> 
> Any ideas are welcome.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Gábor
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-10 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-10 11:51 Gábor Lénárt
2011-11-10 15:59 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111110155947.GA17085@hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=lgb@lgb.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome