From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757094Ab1KKInY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:24 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41462 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755423Ab1KKInX (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:42:51 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, nai.xia@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, lethal@linux-sh.org Subject: Re: mm: convert vma->vm_flags to 64bit Message-ID: <20111111084251.GZ12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110412151116.B50D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4EBC085D.3060107@jp.fujitsu.com> <1320959579.21206.24.camel@pasglop> <4EBC46FD.5010109@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EBC46FD.5010109@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 04:49:49PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Maybe we need to ban useless arch specific flags at first. Maybe a separate vma->vm_arch_flags for them if arches really want this?