From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: [patch 7/7] timekeeping: Reduce seqcount section to update timekeeper/xtime
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:19:50 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111113231341.883550391@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111113230921.728083714@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: timekeeping-reduce-seqcnt-section-more.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1058 bytes --]
The calculation of the timekeeping values is now decoupled from
timekeeper/xtime which are used by the readers. So we can confine the
seqcount section to the mere update of the reader side data.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -986,7 +986,10 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
xtime_calc.tv_sec++;
second_overflow();
}
+}
+static void update_timekeeper(void)
+{
timekeeper = tk_calc;
xtime = xtime_calc;
@@ -1126,10 +1129,13 @@ struct timespec get_monotonic_coarse(voi
*/
void do_timer(unsigned long ticks)
{
+ update_wall_time();
+
write_seqcount_begin(&xtime_seq);
jiffies_64 += ticks;
- update_wall_time();
+ update_timekeeper();
write_seqcount_end(&xtime_seq);
+
calc_global_load(ticks);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-13 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-13 23:19 [patch 0/7] timekeeping: Decouple xtime_lock from xtime seqcount Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 1/7] timekeeping: Split xtime lock into lock and seqcount Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 2/7] ntp: Shorten xtime seqcount sections Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 3/7] timekeeping: Make seqcount sections smaller Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 4/7] timekeeper: Reorder so the hot data is together Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 5/7] timekeeping: Move common updates to a function Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` [patch 6/7] timekeeping: Add extra timekeeper/xtime structs for calculation Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-13 23:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-11-14 6:28 ` [patch 0/7] timekeeping: Decouple xtime_lock from xtime seqcount Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111113231341.883550391@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®