From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754873Ab1KOKbE (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:31:04 -0500 Received: from mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.178]:20016 "EHLO mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754574Ab1KOKbC (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:31:02 -0500 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EADA+wk5R8itd/2dsb2JhbABDqWmBBoFyAQEEATocIxAIA0YUJQMhiBUCuwcSiQ9jBJQviH+IfQ Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:28:03 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Thierry Reding Cc: Paul Bolle , Richard Purdie , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ARCH_PXA_ADX Message-ID: <20111115102803.GC23376@infomag.iguana.be> References: <1321351777.20271.166.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20111115101817.GA6907@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111115101817.GA6907@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, > > 2) So it seems these two drivers could never have been built from the > > mainline tree. (I'm starting to think that the config tools should > > somehow check stuff like this.) > > > > 3) Is the above correct? If it is, why shouldn't I submit the trivial > > patch to remove both these drivers? > > Yes, all of that is correct. Unfortunately, I never got around to mainlining > the rest of the code. Feel free to remove both drivers and add my Acked-by. I will remove the watchdog driver out of my trees and sent it to Linus. Kind regards, Wim.