From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755485Ab1KRIyk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:54:40 -0500 Received: from ud10.udmedia.de ([194.117.254.50]:44146 "EHLO mail.ud10.udmedia.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752447Ab1KRIyj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:54:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:54:36 +0100 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: "Alex,Shi" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413 Message-ID: <20111118085436.GC1615@x4.trippels.de> References: <20111118072519.GA1615@x4.trippels.de> <20111118075521.GB1615@x4.trippels.de> <1321605837.30341.551.camel@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321605837.30341.551.camel@debian> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011.11.18 at 16:43 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > > > > > > The dirty flag comes from a bunch of unrelated xfs patches from Christoph, that > > > I'm testing right now. > > Where is the xfs patchset? I am wondering if it is due to slub code. It > is also possible xfs set a incorrect page flags. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.xfs.general/41810 -- Markus