From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757828Ab1KRNgs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:36:48 -0500 Received: from na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.69]:39636 "EHLO na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755940Ab1KRNgq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:36:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:36:43 +0200 From: Felipe Balbi To: Alessandro Rubini Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anaghi@mail.gnudd.com, balbi@ti.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] debugfs: a tool to print 32-bit registers Message-ID: <20111118133641.GE9999@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Reply-To: balbi@ti.com References: <20111118002049.GA24806@mail.gnudd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111118002049.GA24806@mail.gnudd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:20:49AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > This is V2 of what I posted a few days ago. I also updates > the file in Documentation. I Cc:d people who gave feedback. >=20 > Patch 2 uses the new tool for an existing file I didn't initially > notice (I had a victim file, but it's seriously failing compilation). > Code removal there is almost zero because Felipe Balbi already did > stuff in the way I do. >=20 > Mark Brown suggested to look at drivers/base/regmap, and actually this > may be duplicating what is already being worked on in a more general > way. My code base is earlier than regmap so I didn't notice. > Unfortunately I have no resources left to study regmap as it > deserves. >=20 > Mark, if you say this is not useful at this point, I'm fine with it; I > may return with some regbase-aware code when time permits if it's not > already there. -ENOPATCH ?? I didn't receive any replies to this mail with the patch. Is my mailer screwed up ? --=20 balbi --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOxl9pAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREPOUP/R1304CjfUYWvO4Xraai1eEf H/m9MqRyEw6vEeDuRER4TG9oXPfXuZBtEjUxunWlC3EQERMjh51Gu7hRRIFzyEby 0i6EefQoizPXCM+tfKRHb3bUISWe37dgAZCooJtM+nXPfbOSrrV20W2Q/8aXJW7+ KWy/olzkFbCOG/y3rWAcB9zd6xEsaXDno2xpYVkrKr5txZz4knHea+Glxw+eZYnN tbD8tSn38RIxHa15lvFPVJ7PR4g41Ao/M6TKNLrN2f5QzfbdkdV1WvmwRlO016cK Ruxov6nQIJ2x7SVYS9f9/ZXmtYksGGXIyMxi07Hy2qgGmDHzg5Pnaacz1vRNRmZX U/Kf0JxWC4qpPQoc6PAnwmjEDkKZCGAdZ9o7v4+vsewL/BsC9nVgeZ0jDkXKlnv+ yxMCcTMoxq2SKzBa9nxjQXAnCF7vkX7NkXKQ2N4CVjh47/t60d5lqY1HE9us2YO+ 16V42OWtIo5WyiHvFyPfeV+GQkUPDVVdfYs8BmjBkYwBZ+4zI+PyR5ioroqqfqGn xSumbCOgyczQW+1eXA5CVRioVS2Fl3nYFJUxDaQkyeOBOLLPr1yNuub3PUhhpuPW ma72RHFmT4+rsRwS7/y20ME6SEnyWtQNKM4TjwQ1FoJh7GY5J79tP1Ugq+b5tLp3 DyAgU6zfq+Q6fzx5zPTb =DD26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ffoCPvUAPMgSXi6H--