From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754255Ab1KRStn (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:49:43 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:61246 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751607Ab1KRStl (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:49:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:49:42 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Stephen Warren Cc: Peter De Schrijver , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Randy Dunlap , Russell King , Colin Cross , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] arm/tegra: initial device tree for tegra30 Message-ID: <20111118184942.GA31678@quad.lixom.net> References: <1321546766-26770-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1321546766-26770-2-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1740D74C46@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1740D74C46@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:39:14AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:19 AM: > > This patch adds the initial device tree for tegra30 > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra.txt > ... > > +* harmony: tegra20 based development board > > +Required root node properties: > > + - compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra20"; > > + > > +* seaboard: tegra20 based clamshell reference design > > +Required root node properties: > > + - compatible = "nvidia,seaboard", "nvidia,tegra20"; > > Do we really want to list all the board names here? In the future, there > could be tens or hundreds. I would argue that we should just document > nvidia,tegra20 and nvidia,tegra30. Agreed. > At a later point, we should fix board-dt.c to solely look for those > compatible values, although this will have to wait until the pinmux DT > bindings are present. Then, the kernel won't care about the board names. Exactly. -Olof