From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com>,
alex.shi@intel.com
Subject: [patch 0/6] sched, nohz: load balancing patches
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:03:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111118230323.592022417@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
This is the -v2 of the load balancing patches that makes nohz idle
load balancing more scalabale. While the last 2 in the series are not
directly related to nohz, I clubbed them as part of this series as I noticed
them while I was working in this area and they helped the context switch
intensive workloads improve on the 8-socket system.
Previous RFC version of this can be found at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/1/368
thanks,
suresh
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-18 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-18 23:03 Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Suresh Siddha
2011-11-24 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 2/6] sched, nohz: track nr_busy_cpus in the sched_group_power Suresh Siddha
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-11-24 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:51 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 1:03 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-01 1:17 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-01 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-24 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 4/6] sched, nohz: cleanup the find_new_ilb() using sched groups nr_busy_cpus Suresh Siddha
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 5/6] sched: disable sched feature TTWU_QUEUE by default Suresh Siddha
2011-11-19 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-19 4:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 6/6] sched: fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domain Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 9:51 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domains tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111118230323.592022417@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®