From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755382Ab1KUKBq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:01:46 -0500 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:39136 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753510Ab1KUKBp (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:01:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:01:37 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ankit Jain , Dave Chinner , Christian Ehrhardt , Rik van Riel , Nikanth Karthikesan , LKML , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] readahead: make default readahead size a kernel parameter Message-ID: <20111121100137.GC5084@infradead.org> References: <20111121091819.394895091@intel.com> <20111121093846.251104145@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111121093846.251104145@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:18:21PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > From: Nikanth Karthikesan > > Add new kernel parameter "readahead=", which allows user to override > the static VM_MAX_READAHEAD=128kb. Is a boot-time paramter really such a good idea? I would at least make it a sysctl so that it's run-time controllable, including beeing able to set it from initscripts.