From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Include MSI susceptibility to DMA in creating iommu groups
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:35:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121233505.GG3344@sequoia.sous-sol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111120120043.GB20535@8bytes.org>
* Joerg Roedel (joro@8bytes.org) wrote:
> >From device standpoint a MSI transaction is always a DMA memory write
> to a given address range. The IOMMU-API should export a feature flag
> whether it supports filtering on those transaction or not. We have that
> today with the IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP. I agree that the interface to get
> this information is ugly because a domain is needed. But the interface
> can be fixed. While doing this I suggest to rename that feature
> IOMMU_CAP_INTR_ISOLATION or something like that.
> VFIO can then check for this flag on module-load and refuse to load if
> it is not available.
I can see that the native grouping (the typical pci bridge type) is
really more a property of the topology.
The isolation properties of a group (arguably the whole point of the
group) is subtly different.
Leaves the questions:
What is the value of a group w/out complete isolation?
Is there a practical problem w/ conflating the subtleties above?
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 17:09 Alex Williamson
2011-11-18 4:37 ` Kai Huang
2011-11-18 5:40 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-18 6:20 ` Kai Huang
2011-11-18 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-18 14:56 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-18 15:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-18 16:32 ` Alex Williamson
2011-11-20 12:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-21 4:39 ` Kai Huang
2011-11-21 23:35 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2011-11-23 10:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-11-23 20:12 ` Chris Wright
2011-11-23 18:37 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111121233505.GG3344@sequoia.sous-sol.org \
--to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome