From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v5] arm: fault.c: Port OOM changes into do_page_fault
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:50:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111126235032.GC9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321986690-6079-1-git-send-email-consul.kautuk@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:31:30PM -0500, Kautuk Consul wrote:
> Commit d065bd810b6deb67d4897a14bfe21f8eb526ba99
> (mm: retry page fault when blocking on disk transfer) and
> commit 37b23e0525d393d48a7d59f870b3bc061a30ccdb
> (x86,mm: make pagefault killable)
>
> The above commits introduced changes into the x86 pagefault handler
> for making the page fault handler retryable as well as killable.
>
> These changes reduce the mmap_sem hold time, which is crucial
> during OOM killer invocation.
>
> Port these changes to ARM.
>
> Without these changes, my ARM board encounters many hang and livelock
> scenarios.
> After applying this patch, OOM feature performance improves according to
> my testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@gmail.com>
Thanks. I think this is fine. Please put it in the patch system so it's
not forgotten, and I'll get to it sometime during the next week. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-26 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-22 18:31 Kautuk Consul
2011-11-26 23:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-11-27 5:58 ` Kautuk Consul
2011-11-27 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-01 7:40 ` Kautuk Consul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-22 18:16 Kautuk Consul
2011-11-22 18:33 ` kautuk.c @samsung.com
2011-11-22 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-23 3:23 ` kautuk.c @samsung.com
2011-11-23 3:36 ` kautuk.c @samsung.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111126235032.GC9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=consul.kautuk@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®