mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] specific do_timer_cpu value for nohz off mode
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:13:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130181318.38f4659d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201020727.GB30097@sgi.com>

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:07:27 -0600 Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:

> > And the whole thing is racy, isn't it?  The "new" CPU can go offline a
> > nanosecond after we performed that test, so why perform it at all?
> 
> See my email concerning the panic in cpu_online().

That doesn't address my question.

What's the point in checking cpu_online() when we have no locks to
prevent the online map from changing?

What happens if this cpu goes offline immediately after that check has
passed?


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-08 19:11 Dimitri Sivanich
2011-11-23  0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-30 15:29   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01  0:11     ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01  0:16       ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01  2:07         ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01  2:13           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-12-01 16:37             ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01 22:56               ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-02 20:14                 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-02 20:22                   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-02 22:42                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-12-01  2:06       ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01  2:12         ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-01  2:34           ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-12-01  2:38             ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-15 13:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-15 14:04   ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-15 14:23   ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-25 11:27   ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-15 14:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-15 14:37   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-15 14:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-15 15:34       ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-02-15 20:36         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-02-16 14:59           ` Dimitri Sivanich
2013-03-19 17:03             ` [PATCH][RFC] " Jiri Bohac
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-17 16:07 [PATCH] " Dimitri Sivanich
2011-08-17 16:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-08-23 19:56   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-09-02  8:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-02 19:29       ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-09-02 19:57         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-02 20:39           ` Dimitri Sivanich
2011-08-03 19:57 Dimitri Sivanich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111130181318.38f4659d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome