mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@lycos.com>
Cc: pomac@vapor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
	tino.keitel@tikei.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Do not overflow get_{idle,iowait}_time for nohz (was: Re: Re: [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111202175932.GA3894@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111202164917.GA6139@tiehlicka.suse.cz>

On Fri 02-12-11 17:49:17, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-12-11 14:35:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 29-11-11 11:38:47, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > > On Nov 29, 2011, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote: 
> > >  
> > > > As I have written in other email could you post your config and collect
> > > > the following data?
> > > > for i in `seq 30`; 
> > > > do 
> > > >         cat /proc/stat > `date +'%s'`
> > > >         sleep 1
> > > > done
> > > > export old_user=0 old_nice=0 old_sys=0 old_idle=0 old_iowait=0; 
> > > > 
> > > > # for all your available CPUs
> > > > grep cpu0 * | while read cpu user nice sys idle iowait rest; 
> > > > do 
> > > >         echo $cpu $(($user-$old_user)) $(($nice-$old_nice)) $(($sys-$old_sys)) $(($idle-$old_idle)) $(($iowait-$old_iowait))
> > > >         old_user=$user old_nice=$nice old_sys=$sys old_idle=$idle old_iowait=$iowait
> > > > done
> > > 
> > > 1322566208:cpu0 5199 0 2931 357890604 2541
> > > 1322566209:cpu0 0 0 1 0 0
> > > 1322566210:cpu0 0 0 0 0 0
> > > 1322566211:cpu0 0 0 0 0 0
> [...]
> > 
> > Could you post raw data as well? Ideally starting right after boot and
> > collected for more than 30s (longer better...)
> 
> Ahh, missed that you attached data. And also noticed that you are using
> CONFIG_HZ_300 which explains the problem and why I do cannot reproduce
> it.
> 
> get_{idle,iowait}_time translates us to cputime64_t and it uses
> usecs_to_cputime which is just an alias for usecs_to_jiffies and it does
> 	if (u > jiffies_to_usecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET))
>                 return MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET;
> which in your case (HZ=300) means that we overflow much more often than
> for HZ==100. The patch below should fix this:

And the one with a more cleaned up changelog. No functional changes
---
>From 107887016b91de59194a93c751d040b05d5e37fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:17:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] proc: Do not overflow get_{idle,iowait}_time for nohz

Since a25cac51 [proc: Consider NO_HZ when printing idle and iowait times]
we are reporting idle/io_wait time also while a CPU is tickless. We rely
on get_{idle,iowait}_time functions to retrieve proper data.

These functions, however, use usecs_to_cputime to translate micro
seconds time to cputime64_t. This is just an alias to usecs_to_jiffies
which reduces the data type from u64 to unsigned int and also checks
whether the given parameter overflows jiffies_to_usecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET)
and returns MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET in that case.

When do we overflow depends on CONFIG_HZ but especially for
CONFIG_HZ_300 it is quite low (1431649781) so we are getting
MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET for >3000s! until we overflow unsigned int.
Just for reference CONFIG_100 has an overflow window around 20s,
CONFIG_250 ~8s and CONFIG_1000 ~2s.

This results in a bug when people saw [h]top going mad reporting 100%
CPU usage even though there was basically no CPU load. The reason was
simply that /proc/stat stopped reporting idle/io_wait changes (and
reported MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET) and so the only change happening was for
user system time.

Let's use nsecs_to_jiffies64 instead which doesn't reduce the precision
to 32b type and it is much more appropriate for cumulative time values
(unlike usecs_to_jiffies which intended for timeout calculations).

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
 fs/proc/stat.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 42b274d..2a30d67 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static cputime64_t get_idle_time(int cpu)
 		idle = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.idle;
 		idle = cputime64_add(idle, arch_idle_time(cpu));
 	} else
-		idle = usecs_to_cputime(idle_time);
+		idle = nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * idle_time);
 
 	return idle;
 }
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu)
 		/* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
 		iowait = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat.iowait;
 	else
-		iowait = usecs_to_cputime(iowait_time);
+		iowait = nsecs_to_jiffies64(1000 * iowait_time);
 
 	return iowait;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.3


-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-02 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-28 22:28 [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage pomac
2011-11-29  7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 11:38   ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-29 12:31     ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 12:44       ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 12:54         ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-29 13:10           ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 13:51             ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-29 22:51             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-30 10:12               ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-30 19:56                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-12-01 14:07                   ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-02 10:39                     ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-02 13:35     ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-02 16:49       ` [PATCH] proc: Do not overflow get_{idle,iowait}_time for nohz (was: Re: Re: [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage) Michal Hocko
2011-12-02 17:59         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-12-02 20:12           ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-12-05  8:56             ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-02 17:43       ` Re: Re: [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-29 17:23   ` Ian Kumlien
2011-11-29 17:31   ` Ian Kumlien
2011-11-29 17:56     ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 18:37       ` Ian Kumlien

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111202175932.GA3894@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pomac@vapor.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=t.artem@lycos.com \
    --cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome