Re: [PATCH] Documentation/pinctrl: various minor fixes

["Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König wrote at Thursday, December 08, 2011 3:22 PM:
> > - add some consts
> > - don't use the group index alone to determine the value to write to
> >   foo's mux register. For spi and i2c the group index is always 0.
> >   Additionally using the function index makes much more sense as it
> >   generates a different value for each function/group pair.
> > - fix a few syntax errors
> 
> > @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int foo_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> >  int foo_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> >  		unsigned group)
> >  {
> > -	u8 regbit = (1 << group);
> > +	u8 regbit = (1 << selector + group);
> > 
> >  	writeb((readb(MUX)|regbit), MUX)
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int foo_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> >  int foo_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> >  		unsigned group)
> >  {
> > -	u8 regbit = (1 << group);
> > +	u8 regbit = (1 << selector);
> > 
> >  	writeb((readb(MUX) & ~(regbit)), MUX)
> >  	return 0;
> 
> Shouldn't those two regbit calculations match?
Yes, of course. (Well, it depends on the register model ...)

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |