From: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
To: Andreas Friedrich <afrie@gmx.net>
Cc: "john.stultz@linaro.org" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
<rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION 3.1.5: auto poweron after 5 minutes
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:51:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111211212110.GA8839@bnru05.bnr.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111210140908.GA18596@upset.ux.pdb.fsc.net>
(CCing the lists)
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 15:09:08 +0100, Andreas Friedrich wrote:
> with kernel 3.1.5 I've got a problem on my Toshiba Tecra notebook:
>
> After shuting down my system as usual, it powers on automatically
> after about 5 minutes. With kernel 3.1.4 the system stays off.
>
> After wondering around some time I read something about "ACPI RTC
> wakealarm" and found the description of your fix in the changelog of
> kernel 3.1.5:
>
> commit 0cbc008c56f7b4a11ba6fe80e196d7ab322baabf
> Author: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
> Date: Tue Nov 22 11:03:14 2011 +0100
>
> rtc: Disable the alarm in the hardware
>
> commit c0afabd3d553c521e003779c127143ffde55a16f upstream.
>
> Currently, the RTC code does not disable the alarm in the hardware.
>
> This means that after a sequence such as the one below (the files are in the
> RTC sysfs), the box will boot up after 2 minutes even though we've
> asked for the alarm to be turned off.
>
> # echo $((`cat since_epoch`)+120) > wakealarm
> # echo 0 > wakealarm
> # poweroff
>
> Fix this by disabling the alarm when there are no timers to run.
>
> So may be your fix caused the opposite reaction on my system. Have you
> any ideas to fix this problem?
That patch, in order to disable the alarm, calls set_alarm() on the
RTC driver with alarm->enabled as zero (and a time value that is five
minutes ahead).
Perhaps the ACPI RTC driver enables the alarm even when alarm->enable
is zero? There appears to be handling for this in rtc-cmos.c (I assume
that's what is being used) but I don't know enough about that hardware
to say if that's sufficient or not.
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-11 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111210140908.GA18596@upset.ux.pdb.fsc.net>
2011-12-11 21:21 ` Rabin Vincent [this message]
2011-12-12 16:40 ` Andreas Friedrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111211212110.GA8839@bnru05.bnr.st.com \
--to=rabin.vincent@stericsson.com \
--cc=afrie@gmx.net \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®