From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:59:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111213155933.36cd824a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111213155710.5b453415.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
There is a small race between try_to_wake_up() and sched_move_task(), which is trying
to move the process being woken up.
try_to_wake_up() on CPU0 sched_move_task() on CPU1
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
task_waking_fair()
->p.se.vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime
ttwu_queue()
->send reschedule IPI to another CPU1
raw_spin_unlock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
task_rq_lock()
-> tring to aquire both p->pi_lock and rq->lock
with IRQ disabled
task_move_group_fair()
->p.se.vruntime -= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
->p.se.vruntime += (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
task_rq_unlock()
(via IPI)
sched_ttwu_pending()
raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
ttwu_do_activate()
...
enqueue_entity()
child.se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime
raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock)
As a result, vruntime of the process becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.
This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in task_move_group_fair(),
because the vruntime has already been normalized in task_waking_fair().
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index bdaa4ab..3feb3a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -4925,10 +4925,10 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
* to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
* fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
*/
- if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+ if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
- if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+ if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
}
#endif
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-13 6:57 [PATCH 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:01 ` Paul Turner
2011-12-14 1:04 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-14 1:05 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 6:59 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2011-12-13 12:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Paul Turner
2011-12-15 5:35 ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:44 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 17:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-21 17:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 1:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-22 2:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-15 5:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-19 2:55 ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111213155933.36cd824a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®