mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use -m-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to shrink text size
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:48:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111216004843.dbd0405b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111216081915.GA28288@elte.hu>

On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:19:16 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> This patch turns on -momit-leaf-frame-pointer on x86 builds and 
> thus shrinks .text noticeably. On a defconfig-ish kernel:
> 
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>    9843902	1935808	3649536	15429246	 eb6e7e	vmlinux.before
>    9813764	1935792	3649536	15399092	 eaf8b4	vmlinux.after
> 
> That's 0.3% off text size.
> 
> The actual win is larger than this percentage suggests: many 
> small, hot helper functions such as find_next_bit(), 
> do_raw_spin_lock() or most of the list_*() functions are leaf 
> functions and are now shorter by 2 instructions.
> 
> Probably a good chunk of the framepointers related runtime 
> overhead on common workloads is eliminated via this patch, as 
> small leaf functions execute more often than larger parent 
> functions.
> 
> The call-chains are still intact for quality backtraces and for 
> call-chain profiling (perf record -g), as the backtrace walker 
> can deduct the full backtrace from the RIP of a leaf function 
> and the parent chain.

The only problem I can think of (apart from tickling gcc bugs) is that
it might break __builtin_return_address(n) for n>0 with frame pointers
enabled?  The only code I can find which does this is
drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/ and ftrace.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-16  8:19 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16  8:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-12-16  8:54   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16  8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16  9:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-12-16 10:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-16 16:27       ` Richard Henderson
2011-12-16 11:46     ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-16 12:00       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-16 15:32         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-12-16 14:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-16 14:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111216004843.dbd0405b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome