From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760585Ab1LPTXa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:23:30 -0500 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:37964 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756656Ab1LPTXW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:23:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:23:20 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sasha Levin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Move attribute flags into non __KERNEL__ space Message-ID: <20111216192320.GA23748@infradead.org> References: <1324021626-10059-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1324021626-10059-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:47:06AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > Attribute flags can be useful in userspace when working with filesystems > such as 9p. No, they aren't. They are kernel internal values and userspace has no fucking business messing with them.