mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:49:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219104915.GA19861@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111208232709.GA19820@kroah.com>


* Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:23:54AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Same goes for a whole lot of other crap that distros are 
> > > > carrying. Would we want to merge a different CPU scheduler 
> > > > or the 4g:4g patch or a completely new networking stack into 
> > > > drivers/staging/? I don't think so.
> > > 
> > > Distros have new CPU schedulers and are still dragging the 4g 
> > > split around?  A whole new networking stack would be 
> > > interesting, and if self-contained, possible :)
> > 
> > The point being, there's legitimate reasons to refuse crap to an 
> > area that *people care about* in a constructive manner.
> > 
> > There's no rejection of LTTNG in the "hey, go away, you are 
> > doing it wrong" fashion - we are not holding a monopoly on how 
> > instrumentation is supposed to be done and we've been wrong 
> > before.
> > 
> > There's a highly constructive, open attitude towards LTTNG and 
> > has been for years:
> > 
> >  " Mathieu, please split it up and integrate/unify it with the 
> >    existing instrumentation features of Linux - and if it 
> >    replaces existing stuff because an LTTNG component is 
> >    superior then so be it. "
> 
> Ok, that's fair enough.
> 
> Mathieu, will you please work on this?  Or is there some 
> reason you don't feel this is possible?

Mathieu, any update on this? I don't want the LTTNG goodies to 
drop on the floor - we just have to integrate them properly.

If you 100% disagree with how specific things are done upstream 
right now then don't hold back: just replace existing mechanisms 
- that gives a starting point to discuss what the best way is 
forward.

> > drivers/staging/ is a tool that i support in many (in fact most) 
> > cases - but i don't support it if it does harm.
> > 
> > I'm supposed to say 'no' to extra complexity more often, and 
> > this is definitely one of those cases:
> > 
> > Nacked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > 
> > Also obviously NAK to the scheduler symbol export - that alone 
> > should tell you that it's not just a "driver" - it deeply hooks 
> > into the core kernel...
> > 
> > Please respect the NAK.
> 
> Will do, I'll go delete it from the staging-next tree now.

Thanks Greg!

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-19 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1322775683-8741-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: export vmalloc_sync_all symbol " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 22:13     ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:19       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:41         ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-01 23:00         ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] fs/splice: export splice_to_pipe " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-02  7:19   ` Jens Axboe
2011-12-02 12:32     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 21:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 22:04     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 22:15         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:36           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-02 13:51               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 23:18             ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 23:47               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 22:14     ` Greg KH
2011-12-01 22:20       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-01 23:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01 23:17         ` Greg KH
2011-12-05 14:17           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 21:44             ` Greg KH
2011-12-08  5:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-08 23:27                 ` Greg KH
2011-12-19 10:49                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-12-19 15:30                     ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-20 11:08                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-20 21:46                         ` Frank Rowand
2011-12-23 10:51                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 18:47                         ` Aaron Spear
2011-12-21 18:58                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-23 16:46                         ` Perf ABI (was: Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules) Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-23 17:21                           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-12-23 18:16                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-25 17:46                               ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-12 14:09                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-12 14:54                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 15:39                                     ` [lttng-dev] Perf ABI (was: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-12 15:53                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 15:59                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 16:27                                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-01-12 16:34                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 20:00                                       ` Greg KH
2012-01-16  8:55                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-07 22:57             ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: export task_prio to GPL modules Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-12-08  5:40               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111219104915.GA19861@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome