From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] virtio-blk: Change I/O path from request to BIO
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:05:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111222010538.GA9879@barrios-laptop.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221191117.GA27789@redhat.com>
Hi Vivek,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:11:17PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:00:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This patch is follow-up of Christohp Hellwig's work
> > [RFC: ->make_request support for virtio-blk].
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1199763
> >
> > Quote from hch
> > "This patchset allows the virtio-blk driver to support much higher IOP
> > rates which can be driven out of modern PCI-e flash devices. At this
> > point it really is just a RFC due to various issues."
> >
> > I fixed race bug and add batch I/O for enhancing sequential I/O,
> > FLUSH/FUA emulation.
> >
> > I tested this patch on fusion I/O device by aio-stress.
> > Result is following as.
> >
> > Benchmark : aio-stress (64 thread, test file size 512M, 8K io per IO, O_DIRECT write)
> > Environment: 8 socket - 8 core, 2533.372Hz, Fusion IO 320G storage
> > Test repeated by 20 times
> > Guest I/O scheduler : CFQ
> > Host I/O scheduler : NOOP
>
> May be using deadline or noop in guest is better to benchmark against
> PCI-E based flash.
Good suggestion.
I tested it by deadline on guest side.
The result is not good.
Although gap is within noise, Batch BIO's random performance is regressed
compared to CFQ.
Request Batch BIO
(MB/s) stddev (MB/s) stddev
w 787.030 31.494 w 748.714 68.490
rw 216.044 29.734 rw 216.977 40.635
r 771.765 3.327 r 771.107 4.299
rr 280.096 25.135 rr 258.067 43.916
I did some small test for only Batch BIO with deadline and cfq.
to see I/O scheduler's effect.
I think result is very strange, deadline :149MB, CFQ : 87M
Because Batio BIO patch uses make_request_fn instead of request_rfn.
So I think we should not affect by I/O scheduler.(I mean we issue I/O
before I/O scheduler handles it)
What do you think about it?
Do I miss something?
1) deadline
[root@RHEL-6 ~]# ./aio-stress -c 1 -t 1 -s 128 -r 8 -O -o 3 -d 512 /dev/vda
num_thread 1
adding stage random read
starting with random read
file size 128MB, record size 8KB, depth 512, ios per iteration 8
max io_submit 8, buffer alignment set to 4KB
threads 1 files 1 contexts 1 context offset 2MB verification off
Running single thread version
random read on /dev/vda (149.40 MB/s) 128.00 MB in 0.86s
thread 0 random read totals (149.22 MB/s) 128.00 MB in 0.86s
2) cfq
[root@RHEL-6 ~]# ./aio-stress -c 1 -t 1 -s 128 -r 8 -O -o 3 -d 512 /dev/vda
num_thread 1
adding stage random read
starting with random read
file size 128MB, record size 8KB, depth 512, ios per iteration 8
max io_submit 8, buffer alignment set to 4KB
threads 1 files 1 contexts 1 context offset 2MB verification off
Running single thread version
random read on /dev/vda (87.21 MB/s) 128.00 MB in 1.47s
thread 0 random read totals (87.15 MB/s) 128.00 MB in 1.47s
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-21 1:00 Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: add bio_map_sg Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] virtio: support unlocked queue kick Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] virtio-blk: remove the unused list of pending requests Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] virtio-blk: implement ->make_request Minchan Kim
2011-12-22 12:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-22 20:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] virtio-blk: Support batch I/O for enhancing sequential IO Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 1:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] virtio-blk: Emulate Flush/FUA Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 5:08 ` [PATCH 0/6][RFC] virtio-blk: Change I/O path from request to BIO Rusty Russell
2011-12-21 5:56 ` Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 8:28 ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-21 8:17 ` Minchan Kim
2011-12-21 19:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-22 1:05 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-12-22 15:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-22 23:26 ` Minchan Kim
2011-12-22 12:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-12-22 23:41 ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-01 16:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-02 7:48 ` Dor Laor
2012-01-02 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-02 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-02 16:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-02 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-02 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-02 16:21 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111222010538.GA9879@barrios-laptop.redhat.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome