From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753488Ab1LYWZP (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2011 17:25:15 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:40239 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752448Ab1LYWZL (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2011 17:25:11 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavan Savoy Subject: Re: runtime PM + legacy PM Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:28:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.2.0-rc6+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , Linux PM list References: <201112222255.22288.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112252328.19649.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, December 25, 2011, Pavan Savoy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, December 22, 2011, you wrote: > >> Is there a need for the legacy PM to be enabled when device/drivers > >> run-time PM is supported ? > > > > What do you mean by "legacy PM"? > > I meant suspend/resume driven by user-space. It's not "legacy", it's just a different approach to power management. In principle, it generally is not necessary to support system suspend/resume, but if your driver is used on a platform that supports it, the driver should support it too. Thanks, Rafael