From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gentwo.org (gentwo.org [62.72.0.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8251865E6 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.72.0.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726159222; cv=none; b=NJolJ9cG0icR8FNLw0P5QxRHBEYrBVCPPGw1n0jDfCKqofTaLPplvUYfrB4q8nCdRmVrYSE1me6BzCLhafoQZkhBqgknmBeN6p/y74u+x4s3ICkq4HlmzfASCiNLARQfYSqulgHFscNbGERjI0ZFz0m4kvxu89Ix+DKzBRmLppo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726159222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HOhb4hNq7z9rr9ZEiCwpGut0qhXrpyHakpj2p0jVD3M=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a6SjkZ29jT9aLw1sfRX3dpzEW6DruTom3Q1zCkCvaX9UC1G3Syz1auE6g0jPNN0nALAC2fd4XuRazXnBuVDjaDKqhdXSj+VubtayC55g2Ffy2zVG+a1Q4221U46H2uazo0zlERQWM8YuvcUU2ftjgALpNUyOdlspqq6o8oqAINw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=gentwo.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentwo.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gentwo.org header.i=@gentwo.org header.b=SVcvn/sG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.72.0.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=gentwo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentwo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gentwo.org header.i=@gentwo.org header.b="SVcvn/sG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gentwo.org; s=default; t=1726157734; bh=HOhb4hNq7z9rr9ZEiCwpGut0qhXrpyHakpj2p0jVD3M=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SVcvn/sGQYacPWIkmTWLS7By6x6GWecAx5cfLlTz0EUsgI1afAMuWHRS+KJyxkFRn EF1xWnbu5j82Uc+wkBGL8gH1+a/Qhar9GZT6tgTJS8MXV1w71X01G5mwsVHHoy2QDO oy4WlLjbAJ9qg+TbM+wT/o28xhUPATJsckDBzuYk= Received: by gentwo.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 77DAA401CB; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DA0401C8; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT) From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" To: kernel test robot cc: Christoph Lameter via B4 Relay , Vlastimil Babka , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Yang Shi , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] SLUB: Add support for per object memory policies In-Reply-To: <202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com> Message-ID: <2011fcea-b4f3-a7ec-e747-6ee0195452e1@gentwo.org> References: <20240906-strict_numa-v2-1-f104e6de6d1e@gentwo.org> <202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 8 Sep 2024, kernel test robot wrote: > config: sparc64-randconfig-r121-20240907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> mm/slub.c:222:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'strict_numa' was not declared. Should it be static? Ummm.. This code declares strict_numa. Whats wrong with sparc64 / sparse ? > vim +/strict_numa +222 mm/slub.c > > 220 > 221 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > > 222 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(strict_numa); > 223 #endif > 224 >