From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754051Ab2ADHSz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2012 02:18:55 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:17950 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753830Ab2ADHSv (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2012 02:18:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:18:42 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Christine Caulfield Cc: David Teigland , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: [patch] dlm: le32 vs le16 Message-ID: <20120104071842.GB30978@elgon.mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4F03FD5A.0019,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ->rf_our_slot and ->rf_num_slots are le16 so we should use cpu_to_le16() here. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c index 8f5a1b2..ac5c616 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c +++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ static void set_rcom_config(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct rcom_config *rf, rf->rf_lvblen = cpu_to_le32(ls->ls_lvblen); rf->rf_lsflags = cpu_to_le32(ls->ls_exflags); - rf->rf_our_slot = cpu_to_le32(ls->ls_slot); - rf->rf_num_slots = cpu_to_le32(num_slots); + rf->rf_our_slot = cpu_to_le16(ls->ls_slot); + rf->rf_num_slots = cpu_to_le16(num_slots); rf->rf_generation = cpu_to_le32(ls->ls_generation); }