mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <thilo@ginkel.com>
Cc: oliver@neukum.name, gregkh@suse.de, jhovold@gmail.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: cdc-acm: Fix acm_tty_hangup() vs. acm_tty_close() race
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:14:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120105201418.GA32610@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANvSZQ_y6uZSGgF28+AH+se-ecg+sHhy6pzo7++YvqtArHsUMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:55, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <thilo@ginkel.com> wrote:
> > There is a race condition involving acm_tty_hangup() and acm_tty_close() where
> > hangup() would attempt to access tty->driver_data without proper locking and
> > NULL checking after close() has potentially already set it to NULL.
> > One possibility to (sporadically) trigger this behavior is to perform a
> > suspend/resume cycle with a running WWAN data connection.
> >
> > This patch addresses the issue by introducing a NULL check for
> > tty->driver_data in acm_tty_hangup() protected by open_mutex and exiting
> > gracefully when hangup() is invoked on a device that has already been closed.
> 
> just wondering: Is there any chance that this patch will make it into
> 3.3? I would really appreciate that as the bug it fixes is pretty
> annoying (and potentially causes data loss when the laptop locks up on
> resume) and I am sure that I am not the only one affected by it (at
> least all Lenovo T420s with an Ericsson F5521gw WWAN modem should be
> similarly affected).
> 
> If you would like to see any changes to the code or commit message
> before considering the patch for inclusion, please let me know.

As this isn't going to be an issue with 3.3 (from what I can tell, the
code is correctly reworked in the patch set queued up for 3.3), I'll
submit this for only the 3.2 and older kernel -stable releases, as that
is the only place this should be relevant for.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-17  9:55 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-12-25 21:43 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2012-01-05 20:14   ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120105201418.GA32610@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jhovold@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.name \
    --cc=thilo@ginkel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome