mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Frank Mandarino <fmandarino@endrelia.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Public ridicule due to sound/soc/soc-core.c abuse of the driver model
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:50:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120106205036.GB13857@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120106201458.GF2893@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:15:01PM -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:40:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > It was recently pointed out to me that the sound/soc/soc-core.c is
> > flagrantly abusing the driver model by providing "empty" release
> > functions, just to keep the kernel from complaining:
> 
> > Come on people, do you think that I wrote the code in the kernel that
> > produces those errors just for fun?  It was telling you to fix your code
> > by providing a function to free the structure that is being released,
> > not to try to trick the kernel because you think you know better.  The
> > kernel was trying to help you out here, to get the programming model
> > correct, in a place that was commonly misunderstood.
> 
> The problem is that due to the entertaining nature of AC'97 support in
> Linux we don't actually have anything to free at this point - we'd need
> to redo the whole infrastructure, not just this code.

The fact is that these bugs are oopses waiting to happen.  All you need
is the kernel to hold a reference to the kobject underlying the struct
device, and then release that reference after you've kfree'd the structure
containing the struct device, and the kernel will go bang.

I also disagree with your statement - I think it's quite simple to fix:

1. Change to using a flag to indicate whether the struct device is
   registered rather than ac97->dev.bus.
2. Change snd_soc_new_ac97_codec() to initialize codec->ac97->dev,
   including calling device_initialize() on it and setting the release
   function.
3. Change device_register(&codec->ac97->dev); to
   device_add(&codec->ac97->dev);
4. Make the AC97 device release function do the freeing of 'codec->ac97'
5. Change the current device_unregister(&codec->ac97->dev); to
   device_del(&codec->ac97->dev);
6. Change the various kfree(codec->ac97); in the file to do a
   device_put(&codec->ac97->dev);

This will cause device_put() to check the refcount, when that hits
zero it will call the release function, and that in turn will then
kfree() the ac97 structure.

If someone else is holding a reference to this struct device, kfree
will be called once that reference is dropped - and this is the
exact behaviour the driver model as a whole requires.

At least this gets the AC97 ASoC stuff fixed, and one less abuse of the
driver model in the kernel.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-06 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-06 19:40 Greg KH
2012-01-06 20:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-06 20:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-01-06 21:10     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-06 23:41     ` Mark Brown
2012-01-06 23:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-06 23:49         ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09  9:51           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-09 19:52             ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09 20:11               ` Greg KH
2012-01-09 20:31                 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09 21:37                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-09 22:16                     ` Mark Brown
2012-01-09 23:02                   ` Greg KH
2012-01-06 20:31 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120106205036.GB13857@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=fmandarino@endrelia.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®