From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751890Ab2AGM1S (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 07:27:18 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41064 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734Ab2AGM1R (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 07:27:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:25:11 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] [GIT PULL] tracing: fixes/cleanups, no stop-machine, update stack tracer Message-ID: <20120107122511.GB28462@elte.hu> References: <20120101180949.GA25066@elte.hu> <20120102105856.GA6661@elte.hu> <20120102134856.GA32673@elte.hu> <1325635373.12696.4.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1325635922.12696.8.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1325653301.12696.20.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120104141107.GA24770@elte.hu> <1325696759.12696.24.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20120105091916.GA22598@elte.hu> <1325764011.12696.38.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1325764011.12696.38.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'm also seeing build failures with certain configs: > > > > kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:387:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ftrace_set_early_filter’ > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Hmm, your right. It depends on dyn_ftrace to be configured. > Strange that my tests didn't catch that as I thought one of my > tests compiles with static ftrace. I'll have to look into why > my test didn't catch that. I'll send a fix later today. Hm, i cannot re-test this tree with general randconfig until it keeps failing the build. I'll test the NMI bits, to be able to exclude those. Thanks, Ingo