From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755756Ab2ASIog (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:44:36 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:42216 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755499Ab2ASIoN (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:44:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:55:42 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Huang Shijie Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH resent v2 1/2] ioport : add DEFINE_RES_DMA_SIZE_NAMED macro Message-ID: <20120119085539.GG2247@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1326959620-25920-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1326959620-25920-2-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120119081427.GF2247@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F17D2ED.6090502@freescale.com> <4F17D40F.3080803@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F17D40F.3080803@freescale.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 04:27:59PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > > >Hi Shawn: > >>I'm not sure the patch is welcomed. You may want to just use > >>DEFINE_RES_NAMED for such cases. > >I ever wanted to use DEFINE_RES_NAMED. > sorry. I misunderstood your meaning. > > I think it's better to add a new macro. use DEFINE_RES_NAMED is not proper. > In that case, I can not apply the patch #2 until #1 hits mainline, so remember to ping me for applying patch #2 when the first one gets merged. -- Regards, Shawn