From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932345Ab2ASPoY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:44:24 -0500 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:52146 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756102Ab2ASPoW (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:44:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:45:04 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Michael D Labriola Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Kushal Koolwal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.d.labriola@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , Matthew Garrett , support@versalogic.com, Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, reboot: skip DMI checks if reboot set by user Message-ID: <20120119154504.710e202e@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20120117195841.48fe8236@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > checking if reboot_type's value is anything other than BOOT_ACPI (which > is the default), but that does assume BOOT_ACPI is the default. What if > that's ever changed? Seems likely to me that whoever changes the default > in the future could very easily re-break this at that point. > > Thoughts? Fair point - how about a BOOT_DEFAULT define value if it hasn't been set and we can just make it do the same as ACPI in the switch ? Alan