mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] blkcg: obtaining blkg should be enclosed inside rcu_read_lock()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:58:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119155844.GE5198@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120119155445.GB10908@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:54:45AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > No, no matter whatever synchronization scheme is in use, the code is
> > seriously screwed up if it's doing something like,
> > 
> > 	lock();
> > 	a = lookup();
> > 	unlock();
> > 	return a;
> > 
> > You should *NEVER* be doing that.
> 
> I guess ioc_lookup_icq() is doing something similar. We call it under
> queue lock. Take rcu lock inside for sanity of radix tree and then 
> release rcu lock and return icq.

Yeap, it is.  We should be using rcu_dereference_check() there too.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-19 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-19  1:11 [PATCHSET] blkcg: kill policy node and blkg->dev Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 01/12] blkcg: obtaining blkg should be enclosed inside rcu_read_lock() Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 10:07   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:39     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 15:54       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:58         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 02/12] cfq: don't register propio policy if !CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 10:11   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] elevator: clear auxiliary data earlier during elevator switch Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] elevator: make elevator_init_fn() return 0/-errno Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 11:11   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:44     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] blkcg: update blkg get functions take blkio_cgroup as parameter Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 11:21   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:45     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] blkcg: use q and plid instead of opaque void * for blkio_group association Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 14:04   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 15:55     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:16       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:25         ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:42           ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] blkcg: add blkio_policy[] array and allow one policy per policy ID Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] blkcg: use the usual get blkg path for root blkio_group Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 14:41   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:17     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] blkcg: factor out blkio_group creation Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] blkcg: don't allow or retain configuration of missing devices Tejun Heo
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 11/12] blkcg: kill blkio_policy_node Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 20:32   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 22:03     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 22:30       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 12/12] blkcg: kill the mind-bending blkg->dev Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 15:49   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19 16:30     ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-19 16:46       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-19  1:18 ` [PATCHSET] blkcg: kill policy node and blkg->dev Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120119155844.GE5198@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rni@google.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome