From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752519Ab2AVUHQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:07:16 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:49217 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374Ab2AVUHO (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:07:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:07:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20120122.150707.1411449164435920150.davem@davemloft.net> To: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com Cc: davej@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: Regression tracking From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <201201222052.02135.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References: <201201222031.51116.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> <20120122.143728.1710688129934394279.davem@davemloft.net> <201201222052.02135.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:07:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Maciej Rutecki Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:02 +0100 > OK. But tracking regressions in two (or more) places is nonsense. And this > puts into question all of my current work, such as how to analyze > (automatically) the progress of the whole kernel and its quality per each -rc. > Problem to discussion, but if everyone will do as you wish, it will all work > went to waste. If someone else wants to maintain the state of bugs on some web site and click buttons all day long, that is their perogative. But it's not something I'm going to do. You can't force people to use tools, and frankly that's the end of this conversation as far as I'm concerned.