mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] If init dies, log a signal which killed it, if any.
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:20:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120124162016.08a37b2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327097836-8485-1-git-send-email-vda.linux@googlemail.com>

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:17:16 +0100
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I just received another user's pleas for help when their
> init mysteriously died. I again explained that they need to check
> whether it died because of bad instruction, a segv, or something else.
> Which was an annoying detour into writing a trivial C program
> to spawn his init and print its exit code:
> 
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2012-January/077172.html
> 
> I hear you saying "just test it under /bin/sh". Well, the crashing init
> _was_ /bin/sh.
> 
> Which prompted me to make kernel do this first step automatically.
> We can print exit code, which makes it possible to see that
> death was from e.g. SIGILL without writing test programs.
> 
> The code is fairly self-explanatory. Compile-tested.
> 
> Changes in v.2: don't try to decode signal names, just print
> exit status in hex.
> 
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -710,8 +710,11 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
>  
>  	if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) {
>  		write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> -		if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns))
> -			panic("Attempted to kill init!");
> +		if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) {
> +			panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=%08x\n",
> +				father->signal->group_exit_code ?:
> +					father->exit_code);
> +		}

It's a bit user-hostile to print a hex number in such a context without
the leading 0x.  The %08 does provide a hint - users are unlikely to
interpret 00000011 as 11.  But still, I think...

--- a/kernel/exit.c~kernel-exitc-if-init-dies-log-a-signal-which-killed-it-if-any-fix
+++ a/kernel/exit.c
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reap
 	if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) {
 		write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 		if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) {
-			panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=%08x\n",
+			panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n",
 				father->signal->group_exit_code ?:
 					father->exit_code);
 		}
_

Or maybe we should use %d.  Does anyone use hex for exit codes?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-25  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-20 22:17 Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-23 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-25  0:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-25  9:08   ` Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120124162016.08a37b2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome