From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754434Ab2A3DQE (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:16:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:57693 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754160Ab2A3DQD (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:16:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:27:59 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Stephen Warren Cc: Tony Lindgren , Simon Glass , Dong Aisheng-B29396 , "Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@linaro.org)" , "Sascha Hauer (s.hauer@pengutronix.de)" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "cjb@laptop.org" , Dong Aisheng , Thomas Abraham , "Grant Likely (grant.likely@secretlab.ca)" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2 Message-ID: <20120130032757.GE10470@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1780DAB4CE@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20120127022111.GK29812@atomide.com> <20120127173732.GJ13504@atomide.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF178E123E62@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF178E123E62@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:51:58AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > I don't think there's any point in having 2 separate bindings; it's been > hard enough to come up with /one/ binding! +1 -- Regards, Shawn