From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] hwmon: add MAX197 support
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:15:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210161538.GB1060@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210110755.4914b332@v0nbox>
Vivien,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:46:04 -0800,
> Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:15 -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > BTW, about the TS-5500 ADC part, is a platform ts5500_adc.c file the
> > > better solution, or should the device be declared in the ts5500.c
> > > platform code?
> > >
> > I would suggest to declare it in the ts5500.c platform code. That
> > seems to be the common approach as far as I can see.
> >
> > platform_add_devices() works pretty well for this. It saves you from
> > having to call platform_device_register() for each device separately.
> > Obviously that only works if all devices are declared in a single
> > file.
>
> As the LED is registered using the leds_class, I think
> platform_add_devices() couldn't be used here.
>
> Lots of platform codes don't check the returned
> value of platform_add_devices(). Should we care about a LED or ADC
> registration failure (is the following snippet OK?)?
>
> static int __init ts5500_init(void)
> {
> [...]
> pdev = platform_device_register_simple("ts5500", -1, NULL, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(pdev);
> goto release_mem;
> }
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ts5500);
>
> ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> &ts5500_attr_group);
> if (ret)
> goto release_pdev;
>
> led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &ts5500_led_cdev);
> if (ts5500->adc) {
> ts5500_adc_pdev.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> platform_device_register(&ts5500_adc_pdev);
> }
>
I didn't look at other code, but personally I try to be consistent.
Why do you check the return value from platform_device_register_simple() above,
but not the return code from platform_device_register() ?
That does not seem to be very consistent to me.
Thanks,
Guenter
> return 0;
>
> release_pdev:
> platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> release_mem:
> kfree(ts5500);
>
> return ret;
> }
> device_initcall(ts5500_init);
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Vivien Didelot
> Savoir-faire Linux Inc.
> Tel: (514) 276-5468 #149
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 21:05 [PATCH v5 0/5] Support for the TS-5500 platform Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add platform base support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add GPIO support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-02-02 19:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-06 15:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 20:23 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-07 11:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add LED support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] hwmon: add MAX197 support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-06 20:15 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-06 20:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-10 16:07 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-10 16:15 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2012-02-10 18:14 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-20 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-20 19:56 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add ADC support Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210161538.GB1060@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome