From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] signal: zap_pid_ns_processes: s/SEND_SIG_NOINFO/SEND_SIG_FORCED/
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:01:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210200108.GD20898@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210200004.GA20890@redhat.com>
Change zap_pid_ns_processes() to use SEND_SIG_FORCED, it looks more
clear compared to SEND_SIG_NOINFO which relies on from_ancestor_ns
logic send_signal().
It is also more effecient if we need to kill a lot of tasks because
it doesn't alloc sigqueue.
While at it, add the __fatal_signal_pending(task) check as a minor
optimization.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index a896839..17b2328 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -168,13 +168,9 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
while (nr > 0) {
rcu_read_lock();
- /*
- * Any nested-container's init processes won't ignore the
- * SEND_SIG_NOINFO signal, see send_signal()->si_fromuser().
- */
task = pid_task(find_vpid(nr), PIDTYPE_PID);
- if (task)
- send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, task);
+ if (task && !__fatal_signal_pending(task))
+ send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
1.5.5.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 20:00 [PATCH 0/4] signal: force_sig cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 21:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-14 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-14 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] signal: cosmetic, s/from_ancestor_ns/force/ in prepare_signal() paths Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] signal: oom_kill_task: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-13 16:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-02-10 20:01 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210200108.GD20898@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome