From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755666Ab2BOVCp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:02:45 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55083 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755426Ab2BOVCm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:02:42 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
        KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
        Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map.
Message-Id: <20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other
> architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of
> Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your
> patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply
> at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also
> touches ia64).

OK, I'm officially all confused.  I think I'll drop everything and wait
until it settles down.  Please, someone prepare a single patch series.

The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are:

smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch
#arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
#tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch
slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch
fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch
#
arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch
cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch

So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two?