From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756915Ab2BPCbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:31:52 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56593 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756333Ab2BPCbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:31:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:32:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Rusty Russell Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Venkatesh Pallipadi , KOSAKI Motohiro , Mike Travis , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul Gortmaker , Gilad Ben-Yossef Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map. Message-Id: <20120215183204.7928884a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <87k43nbsli.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <87k43nbsli.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:40:49 +1030 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530 > > "Srivatsa S. Bhat" wrote: > > > > > This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other > > > architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of > > > Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your > > > patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply > > > at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also > > > touches ia64). > > > > OK, I'm officially all confused. I think I'll drop everything and wait > > until it settles down. Please, someone prepare a single patch series. > > > > The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are: > > > > smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch > > #arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold > > arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch > > #tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold > > tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch > > smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch > > slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch > > fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch > > mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch > > mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch > > mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch > > # > > arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch > > cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch > > > > So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two? > > Keep them all, I'll rebase on top of linux-next, and send you a few > patches. I'm not going to break down by arch, that was just in the hope > that the arch maintainers themselves would take them... This stuff probably isn't all in linux-next yet. I tried to get an update going today but failed. I'll try again tomorrow, but it depends on how many additional oopses and build breakages our team of top-notch engineers chooses to add overnight.