From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751689Ab2BQLVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:21:39 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47409 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751027Ab2BQLVi (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:21:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:21:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Matt Fleming Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Zhang Rui , Huang Ying , Andrew Morton , Keith Packard Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed address is invalid" Message-ID: <20120217112117.GB14789@elte.hu> References: <86sjkpiw8i.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> <1323962963.314.14.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1326705757.3629.18.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <20120116093133.GB15333@elte.hu> <1326707367.3629.26.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <20120116095529.GA838@elte.hu> <1326708966.3629.31.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1328705209.3718.1.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <86d39pfdqd.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> <1329307981.3675.120.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1329307981.3675.120.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 09:15 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > <#part sign=pgpmime> > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > > > > > Ping? Keith, have you had chance to test this patch yet? > > > > No, I haven't had a chance to try the patch, and I'm leaving > > on vacation tomorrow until March 1... > > Hmm... I haven't been able to find anybody else willing to > test this patch either. > > Ingo, got any opinions on how to handle this? Please send the latest and I'll apply it. If we don't get voluntary testers then involuntary ones will have to do :-/ Thanks, Ingo