On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:46:49PM +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > + SOC_SINGLE_TLV("Playback Limitter Min Input Volume", > + ML26124_PL_MAXMIN_GAIN, 0, 7, 0, mingain), Limiter. > + SOC_SINGLE("Zero Cross Comparator Switch", ML26124_PW_ZCCMP_PW_MNG, 1, > + 1, 0), Usually just "ZC Switch". > + SOC_SINGLE("Digital Switch", ML26124_DVOL_CTL, 4, 1, 0), This should probably be Digital Playback Switch so it lines up with the volume control in the UIs (and the Volume controls should be Digital X Volume). > +static int ml26124_update_bits(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, unsigned short reg, > + unsigned int mask, unsigned int value) Why are you open coding this in your driver? There is no point in replicating subsystem functionality. > +if (!priv) > + return -1; > + Coding style and return real error codes (though this looks like it should never happen). > +static int ml26124_set_dai_clkdiv(struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai, > + int div_id, int div) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = codec_dai->codec; > + > + switch (div_id) { > + case ML26124_MCLK: > + ml26124_update_bits(codec, ML26124_CLK_CTL, > + BIT(0) | BIT(1), div); > + break; Why can't the driver calculate this automatically given the MCLK? > + case SND_SOC_BIAS_ON: > + pr_debug("%s: level=ON priv=%p\n", __func__, priv); There's already more than enough logging in the subsystem for this. > + /* VMID ON */ > + ml26124_update_bits(codec, ML26124_PW_REF_PW_MNG, > + ML26124_VMID, ML26124_VMID); > + msleep(500); This looks like it should be _STANDBY - usually VMID must be on to power everything else. > +static int ml26124_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > + int cmd, struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = codec_dai->codec; > + > + switch (cmd) { > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: > + ml26124_update_bits(codec, ML26124_REC_PLYBAK_RUN, 0x3, > + 0); I'm not sure you've tested this, you can't do I2C I/O from atomic context and trigger is atomic. What does this control actually do? > + return 0; > + break; Duplicate return and break here. > +static int ml26124_resume(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) > +{ > + struct ml26124_priv *priv = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); > + > + regcache_sync(priv->regmap); > + ml26124_set_bias_level(codec, SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY); Setting the bias level will duplicate the sync. > +static int ml26124_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct ml26124_priv *priv = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec); > + codec->control_data = priv->regmap; > + > + ret = snd_soc_codec_set_cache_io(codec, 8, 8, SND_SOC_I2C); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(codec->dev, "Failed to set cache I/O: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } You're mixing regmap API usage and ASoC level I2C, this should be _REGMAP. > +/* power down chip */ > +static struct snd_soc_codec_driver soc_codec_dev_ml26124 = { This comment is misplaced. > +static struct i2c_driver ml26124_i2c_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "ml26124-codec", No -codec, the device only does one thing. > +static int __init ml26124_modinit(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = i2c_add_driver(&ml26124_i2c_driver); > + if (ret != 0) module_i2c_driver().