From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932564Ab2CALms (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 06:42:48 -0500 Received: from hqemgate03.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.140]:6396 "EHLO hqemgate03.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932327Ab2CALmp (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 06:42:45 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:42:29 -0800 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:42:11 +0200 From: Peter De Schrijver To: Stephen Warren CC: Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , "Russell King" , Gary King , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Add tegra30 support for secondary cores Message-ID: <20120301114211.GP12917@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1328831277-21002-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF178FACB954@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20120229154229.GL12917@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BDDF21F3@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BDDF21F3@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> X-NVConfidentiality: public User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:38:16PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: > Peter De Schrijver wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:42 AM: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:27:43PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, February 09, 2012 4:48 PM: > > > > This patchset introduces support for secondary cores on tegra30. It also > > > > introduces some functions for the flowcontroller and adds basic support for > > > > tegra30 powerdomains. > > > > > > The code looks fine to me. I do notice the following when running > > > "shutdown -h now": > > > > > > [ 27.762124] SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs > > I can't seem to reproduce this at all on next-20120229 anymore. What > kind of repro frequency are you seeing, and does it get fixed if you > update to that baseline? > I see it abount once every 3 reboots. I have a an expect script which automates the test. I haven't tried with next-20120229 yet. > (I tried 20 times with shutdown, and 15 of them I reverted all the CPU > and cache errata in case they affected the issue at all) Cheers, Peter.