From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932611Ab2CEPAf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:00:35 -0500 Received: from ackle.nomi.cz ([81.31.33.35]:39957 "EHLO ackle.nomi.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932150Ab2CEPAe (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:00:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:00:31 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBKYW5vdcWhZWs=?= To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: wwguy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Johannes Berg , security@kernel.org Subject: Re: iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise Message-ID: <20120305150031.GA22387@nomi.cz> References: <20111114140714.GD2513@redhat.com> <20111119181106.GA5515@nomi.cz> <1321755233.22510.1.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> <20111120032016.GA14520@nomi.cz> <1321763314.22510.4.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> <20111120204007.GA7273@nomi.cz> <20120210180929.GA17733@nomi.cz> <20120214092020.GB12905@redhat.com> <20120305140130.GA15186@nomi.cz> <20120305145700.GA17800@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120305145700.GA17800@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:57:01PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > No problem. Can you remind me, is this reproducible on 64-bit kernel > with 32-bit user space? I'm asking because I would like to know if we > need to backport those fixes to our kernel. We do not enable > CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL on 32 bit kernel, only on 64 bit, but if this > problem happen with 32-bit user land with 64 bit kernel, we will need to > do backport. It happens in 32-bit KVM guests on a 64-bit host, so I guess you need it. Regards, -- Tomáš Janoušek, a.k.a. Liskni_si, http://work.lisk.in/