mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.3-rc6
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:18:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120308211832.GU2348@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120307121138.GB5237@x1.osrc.amd.com>

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:11:38PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:32:27AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 06:57:31PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Hmm. Nothing much to say about this -rc: it really is all small fixes
> > > and cleanups.
> > > 
> > > In fact, it's been calm enough that this *might* be the last -rc, but
> > > we'll see how the upcoming week goes. If it stays calm (and hopefully
> > > even calms down some more), there doesn't seem to be any major reason
> > > to drag out the release cycle any more.
> > > 
> > > But hey, that does imply that people who have seen regressions should
> > > re-check them and holler loudly if they are still seeing problems.
> > 
> > Just a couple of warnings, just saw them when booted
> > 3.3.0-rc6-00104-gf3969bf78f14 yesterday on this box. I'm ccing Paul for
> > the first two,
> 
> Ok, looks like Paul knows about those already:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132744022215850 and further.
> 
> @Paul: which patch is the latest adding rcu_idle_enter/_exit() calls to pm_idle
> assignees, which you'd like me to test?

This one, which defines RCU_NONIDLE(): https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/3/498

And then the following patch on top of that.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

x86: Protect printk() in amd_e400_idle() with RCU_NONIDLE()

Because printk() uses RCU, it cannot be used in the idle loop unless
enclosed by RCU_NONIDLE().  This commit makes the required adjustment.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 15763af..b185a32 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
 			amd_e400_c1e_detected = true;
 			if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC))
 				mark_tsc_unstable("TSC halt in AMD C1E");
-			printk(KERN_INFO "System has AMD C1E enabled\n");
+			RCU_NONIDLE(
+				printk(KERN_INFO "System has AMD C1E enabled\n");
+			);
 		}
 	}
 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-09 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-04  2:57 Linus Torvalds
2012-03-04  6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-07 10:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-07 12:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-08 21:18     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-03-10 15:16       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120308211832.GU2348@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome