From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754790Ab2CJKmu (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:42:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:63691 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754232Ab2CJKmr (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:42:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:42:38 +0100 From: Richard Cochran To: David Miller Cc: tshimizu818@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, john.stultz@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, khc@pm.waw.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.wang@intel.com, yong.y.wang@intel.com, joel.clark@intel.com, kok.howg.ewe@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock Message-ID: <20120310104238.GA3489@netboy.at.omicron.at> References: <1331079669-22446-1-git-send-email-tshimizu818@gmail.com> <20120306.213453.700930266749202538.davem@davemloft.net> <20120309173032.GA5730@netboy.at.omicron.at> <20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:00:06PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Richard Cochran > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:30:32 +0100 > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:34:53PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> You still haven't submitted this properly. > >> > >> First, you submitted the PCH_GBE driver changes before the EG20T > >> PTP clock driver which it depends upon. > > > > David, both this pair of patches and the second pair apply cleanly to > > both Torvalds mainline and to net-next. So, what are you complaining > > about here? I am still confused. > > I'm complaining submitting changes properly, and that has nothing > to do with where or how cleanly the patches apply. After reviewing the patches, now I see the dependencies. Sorry for the noise, Richard