From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753942Ab2CKSu1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:50:27 -0400 Received: from 8.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net ([188.165.52.147]:41581 "EHLO mo2.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751988Ab2CKSuY (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:50:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:38:56 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD To: Alan Ott Cc: Andrew Victor , Nicolas Ferre , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Ben Dooks X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.2 (mo2.mail-out.ovh.net) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA Message-ID: <20120311183856.GA13869@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1331415380-10928-1-git-send-email-alan@signal11.us> <1331415531-10961-1-git-send-email-alan@signal11.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1331415531-10961-1-git-send-email-alan@signal11.us> X-PGP-Key: http://uboot.jcrosoft.org/plagnioj.asc X-PGP-key-fingerprint: 6309 2BBA 16C8 3A07 1772 CC24 DEFC FFA3 279C CE7C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17576141972069526451 X-Ovh-Remote: 213.251.161.87 (ns32433.ovh.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegvddrfeefucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecuhfhrohhmpeflvggrnhdqvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvucfrnfetiffpkffqnfdqggfknffnteftffcuoehplhgrghhnihhojhesjhgtrhhoshhofhhtrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdfttddtredv X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegvddrfeefucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecuhfhrohhmpeflvggrnhdqvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvucfrnfetiffpkffqnfdqggfknffnteftffcuoehplhgrghhnihhojhesjhgtrhhoshhofhhtrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdfttddtredv Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar , Alan Ott wrote: > Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which > chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done > by Arnd Bergmann. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Alan Ott > CC: Ben Dooks > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET > bool > > +config AT91_HAS_PATA > + bool what is the need for this? As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT Best Regards, J.