From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756081Ab2CLSHq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:07:46 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:38502 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755080Ab2CLSHo (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:07:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:07:38 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: simon@mungewell.org Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Bauer , Michal Maly Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] HID: hid-lg4ff add support for G27 LEDs Message-ID: <20120312180738.GD14020@sirena.org.uk> References: <1331565459-1892-1-git-send-email-simon@mungewell.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Yow! Are we laid back yet? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:04:14PM -0400, simon@mungewell.org wrote: > At the moment you'd just drive the LEDs simply, ie: > $ echo 31 > /sys/bus/hid/devices/.../leds Shouldn't this be using the LED subsystem the kernel already has?