On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:14:42 +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 13 March 2012 09:13, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:08:08 +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > Otherwise, the patch looks pretty good.  (although seeing the decode function > > has got me thinking that we need a much better way of decoding the dt data). > > The parsing function looks huge since there is lot of data to pick up > from the dt node. Oh, I understand that you have to do it this way; I just think the core code should make it a lot easier. :-) g.