From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030880Ab2COPdj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:33:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6725 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932411Ab2COPdh (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:33:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:33:31 -0600 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low Performance USB Block" driver Message-ID: <20120315093331.6472333e@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: <1331758372-9851-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> References: <1331758372-9851-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:52:51 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > +What: Low Performance USB Block driver ("CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB") > +When: 3.6 ACK > + does not use libusual which holds various workarounds for > + certain buggy devices. Although the above is false, and ub actually started libusual, I don't mind. It's a transient notice anyway. Once ub is gone, libusual can be folded back into usb-storage. -- Pete