From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: defer freeing pages when gathering surplus pages
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:44:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120315144400.GA19855@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd=RBBd0vF1waARU5FQbomLQLAG5ekmiWg+WDpALke9SaGP1g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed 14-03-12 21:08:13, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> > [Sorry for the late reply but I was away from email for quite sometime]
> >
>
> Nice to see you back:)
Thanks
>
> > On Tue 14-02-12 20:53:51, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >> When gathering surplus pages, the number of needed pages is recomputed after
> >> reacquiring hugetlb lock to catch changes in resv_huge_pages and
> >> free_huge_pages. Plus it is recomputed with the number of newly allocated
> >> pages involved.
> >>
> >> Thus freeing pages could be deferred a bit to see if the final page request is
> >> satisfied, though pages could be allocated less than needed.
> >
> > The patch looks OK but I am missing a word why we need it. I guess
>
> False negative is removed as it should be.
Right, I meant false negative. Would be nice to have it in the
changelog... Anyway, Andrew has already picked up the patch I guess.
Just in case
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > your primary motivation is that we want to reduce false positives when
> > we fail to allocate surplus pages while somebody freed some in the
> > background.
> > What is the workload that you observed such a behavior? Or is this just
> > from the code review?
> >
> The second.
OK
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 12:53 Hillf Danton
2012-03-14 11:13 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-14 13:08 ` Hillf Danton
2012-03-15 14:44 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120315144400.GA19855@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®