From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756308Ab2CUHIC (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:08:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:39048 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753677Ab2CUHIA (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:08:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:07:07 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Rafal Prylowski Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vinod.koul@intel.com" , H Hartley Sweeten , "rmallon@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels Message-ID: <20120321070707.GA25052@mwesterb-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4F683B36.8090101@metasoft.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F683B36.8090101@metasoft.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:09:26AM +0100, Rafal Prylowski wrote: > Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels. > > Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski > > Index: slave-dma/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c > =================================================================== > --- slave-dma.orig/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c > +++ slave-dma/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ Which tree this is supposed to apply? I tried both mainline and -next and it doesn't apply cleanly there.