From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759646Ab2CUQ1b (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:27:31 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:43757 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759194Ab2CUQ13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:27:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:27:26 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Adrian McMenamin Cc: Greg KH , Adrian McMenamin , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh Subject: Re: [PATCH] VMUFAT filesystem [1/4] Message-ID: <20120321162726.GA27778@sirena.org.uk> References: <20120321153317.GA30250@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Steal this tagline. I did. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24:19AM +0800, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > I guess the complaint is that I didn't include this with each bit. So, > apologies for that, I cut it up by hand to avoid a 1700 line single > patch. But I won't post it this way again, obviously Nope, there's some other issues (like the signoff being after the ---). Check the document again, and compare your mail with other patches.